I've been thinking about something that I mentioned quite some time ago. The story of love that first took hold in the mid-1700's. The first love story was written around 1750. As I described, the story had no choice but to evolve into a story in which coitus was fulfilling, even though, for the vast majority, it is not. As I say in Fiction, that's what people want to read about.
What just struck me is the insidious effect that had on men. I'm not saying it's a bad thing. It was necessary and I expect I never would have gotten to understanding the total screwup that our past has been without the love story becoming a thing. It led to everything else, including the Flower Power generation that ended in wrack and ruin. It seems I'm the only one that took the crucial lesson away from that amazing attempt to become Human.
The crucial calamity that the love story introduced is the blind stumbling insidious intrusion of the question in men's minds that impedes more than anything without the answer. "Is it just me?" The love story highlights the failure of men without ever addressing it directly. Any man that reads it will probably think his failure is uncommon. Hence, enhanced paranoia from each man that fails to make coitus a loving event. It encouraged the feeling of isolation, every man for himself, that has become more common than is comfortable. The Love Story makes the conclusion that all men should easily be able to love physically (which, ironically, is true but so far from being the truth). How do you think this affects all of the men (which has to be like 99%) that cannot last as long as they would like? (see Fiction for further reference).
The crucial calamity that the love story introduced is the blind stumbling insidious intrusion of the question in men's minds that impedes more than anything without the answer. "Is it just me?" The love story highlights the failure of men without ever addressing it directly. Any man that reads it will probably think his failure is uncommon. Hence, enhanced paranoia from each man that fails to make coitus a loving event. It encouraged the feeling of isolation, every man for himself, that has become more common than is comfortable. The Love Story makes the conclusion that all men should easily be able to love physically (which, ironically, is true but so far from being the truth). How do you think this affects all of the men (which has to be like 99%) that cannot last as long as they would like? (see Fiction for further reference).
As usual, we avoided the question and the Love Story just added fuel to the fire. I guess that is the only way it could have gone.
The simpleton answers that have become accepted since the Flower Power generation first inaccurately highlighted the issue, once again, are not Human. Please refer to Thinking It Through and Fiction. They don't completely answer but give the necessary clues.
The simpleton answers that have become accepted since the Flower Power generation first inaccurately highlighted the issue, once again, are not Human. Please refer to Thinking It Through and Fiction. They don't completely answer but give the necessary clues.
The first step is to separate the lies from the truths. Clarity far beyond anything we have ever attempted.
The force of our desire for clarity will not be denied. Our attempts to do so bring wrack and ruin.
The force of our desire for clarity will not be denied. Our attempts to do so bring wrack and ruin.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No comments